Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
x Close Forever Close
Volume 36 Issue 4
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service  > 2018  >  36(4): 379-384

LU Guangzhao, ZHANG He, FAN Li, SUN Zhiguo, LU Ying. Effect of different injection approaches of tumor RNA nanoliposome vaccine on the growth of colon cancer[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2021, 39(6): 520-524, 556. doi: 10.12206/j.issn.1006-0111.202108094
Citation: BAI Xiangrong, CHENG Hongqin, ZHANG Yan, JIN Yin. A Meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of urinary fungal infection[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2018, 36(4): 379-384. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.04.021
shu

A Meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of urinary fungal infection

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.04.021

  • Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10053, China

  • Received Date: 2017-07-03
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-01-19
  • Objective Systematic evaluation of effectiveness and safety of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in urinary tract fungal infection. Methods Cross-sectional or controlled studies of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of urinary tract fungal infection were collected by the search of Pubmed, Embase, WEB OF SCIENCE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, ViP Database and SinoMed. Results 12 studies with 853 patients were included. Amphotericin B bladder irrigation had fungal clearance rate RR=0.81[0.75, 0.87] after 24 hours and 0.71[0.63, 0.79] after > 5 days. Clearance of candiduria in 24 hours with amphotericin B continuous irrigation was 0.83[0.75,0.91], while the intermittent bladder irrigation was 0.78[0.68,0.88]. Clearance of candiduria >5 days for those two groups was 0.74[0.65,0.84] and 0.60[0.44,0.76]. In the comparative studies with amphotericin B bladder irrigation vs fluconazole, clearance of candiduria in 24 hours and> 5 days was 1.27[1.07,1.50] and 0.92[0.78,1.10]. There was a report of hematuria with amphotericin B bladder irrigation. Conclusion Amphotericin B bladder irrigation showed similar efficacy in candiduria clearance as the systemic treatment with fluconazole. The continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B is more effective than intermittent irrigation. Due to the limited literatures available, the large scale double blinded clinical trials are needed to verify the efficacy.
  • [1] WISE GJ,WAINSTEIN S,GOLDBERG P,et al. Candidal cystitis. Management by continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B[J]. JAMA,1973,224(12):1636-1637.
    [2] WISE GJ,KOZINN PJ,GOLDBERG P. Amphotericin B as a urologic irrigant in the management of noninvasive candiduria[J]. J Urol,1982,128(1):82-84.
    [3] HSU CC,UKLEJA B. Clearance of Candida colonizing the urinary bladder by a two-day amphotericin B irrigation[J]. Infection,1990,18(5):280-282.
    [4] JACOBS LG,SKIDMORE EA,CARDOSO LA,et al. Bladder irrigation with amphotericin B for treatment of fungal urinary tract infections[J]. Clin Infect Dis,1994,18(3):313-318.
    [5] TRINH T,SIMONIAN J,VIGIL S,et al. Continuous versus intermittent bladder irrigation of amphotericin B for the treatment of candiduria[J]. J Urol,1995,154(6):2032-2034.
    [6] LEU HS,HUANG CT. Clearance of funguria with short-course antifungal regimens:a prospective,randomized,controlled study[J]. Clin Infect Dis,1995,20(5):1152-1157.
    [7] FAN-HAVARD P,O'DONOVAN C,SMITH SM,et al. Oral fluconazole versus amphotericin B bladder irrigation for treatment of candidal funguria[J]. Clin Infect Dis,1995,21(4):960-965.
    [8] FONG IW. The value of a single amphotericin B bladder washout in candiduria[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,1995,36(6):1067-1071.
    [9] JACOBS LG,SKIDMORE EA,FREEMAN K,et al. Oral fluconazole compared with bladder irrigation with amphotericin B for treatment of fungal urinary tract infections in elderly patients[J]. Clin Infect Dis,1996,22(1):30-35.
    [10] NESBIT SA,KATZ LE,MCCLAIN BW,et al. Comparison of two concentrations of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of funguria in patients with indwelling urinary catheters[J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm,1999,56(9):872-875.
    [11] 朱卫华,马峰. 两性霉素B膀胱冲洗治疗尿路真菌感染临床分析[J]. 中外医疗,2015,34(18):127-128,131.
    [12] SULLIVAN KA,CAYLOR MM,LIN FC,et al. Comparison of amphotericin B bladder irrigations versus fluconazole for the treatment of candiduria in intensive care unit patients[J]. J Pharm Pract,2017,30(3):347-352.
    [13] PAPPAS PG,KAUFFMAN CA,ANDES DR,et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis:2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2016,62(4):e1-50.
    [14] 李延鸿,朱怀军. 膀胱冲洗对预防留置导尿管引起尿路感染作用的系统评价[J]. 实用药物与临床,2012,15(8):494-496.
    [15] SOBEL JD,KAUFFMAN CA,MCKINSEY D,et al. Candiduria:a randomized,double-blind study of treatment with fluconazole and placebo. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2000,30(1):19-24.
    [16] TUON FF,AMATO VS,PENTEADO FILHO SR. Bladder irrigation with amphotericin B and fungal urinary tract infection systematic review with Meta-analysis[J]. Int J Infect Dis,2009,13(6):701-706.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0400.250.50.7511.25Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 87.0 %FULLTEXT: 87.0 %META: 11.2 %META: 11.2 %PDF: 1.8 %PDF: 1.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.8 %其他: 21.8 %其他: 1.8 %其他: 1.8 %Canton: 0.2 %Canton: 0.2 %China: 1.1 %China: 1.1 %Fairfax: 0.2 %Fairfax: 0.2 %Germany: 0.3 %Germany: 0.3 %Madison: 0.2 %Madison: 0.2 %Singapore: 0.4 %Singapore: 0.4 %South Africa: 0.2 %South Africa: 0.2 %Tunisia: 0.6 %Tunisia: 0.6 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.7 %[]: 0.7 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 2.1 %上海: 2.1 %上饶: 0.1 %上饶: 0.1 %临夏回族自治州: 0.1 %临夏回族自治州: 0.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %北京: 11.5 %北京: 11.5 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %印度阿萨姆: 0.2 %印度阿萨姆: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %吉隆坡: 0.2 %吉隆坡: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %坦佩: 0.2 %坦佩: 0.2 %大理: 0.1 %大理: 0.1 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %安阳: 0.3 %安阳: 0.3 %宜宾: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.2 %密蘇里城: 0.2 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 2.2 %广州: 2.2 %广西南宁: 0.1 %广西南宁: 0.1 %开罗: 0.2 %开罗: 0.2 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %怀化: 0.1 %怀化: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昌吉: 0.1 %昌吉: 0.1 %普洱: 0.2 %普洱: 0.2 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.4 %海得拉巴: 0.4 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %美国华盛顿昆西: 0.2 %美国华盛顿昆西: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 12.0 %芒廷维尤: 12.0 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %葵涌: 0.2 %葵涌: 0.2 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %西宁: 28.3 %西宁: 28.3 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.2 %赤峰: 0.2 %运城: 0.4 %运城: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %香港特别行政区: 0.4 %香港特别行政区: 0.4 %马尼拉: 0.3 %马尼拉: 0.3 %鸡西: 0.1 %鸡西: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.6 %黄冈: 0.6 %龙岩: 0.2 %龙岩: 0.2 %其他其他CantonChinaFairfaxGermanyMadisonSingaporeSouth AfricaTunisiaUnited States[]三明上海上饶临夏回族自治州临汾丽水乐山佛山加利福尼亚州北京南京南宁印度阿萨姆厦门合肥吉隆坡呼和浩特唐山圣地亚哥坦佩大理天津威海安阳宜宾密蘇里城巴黎常州广州广西南宁开罗张家口怀化惠州成都抚州新乡日照昆明昌吉普洱杭州枣庄武汉洛阳海得拉巴淄博淮安湖州湛江潍坊石家庄美国华盛顿昆西芒廷维尤苏州葵涌衡水西宁西安贵阳赤峰运城邯郸重庆金华长沙长治阳泉青岛香港特别行政区马尼拉鸡西黄冈龙岩Highcharts.com

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Get Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(4126) PDF downloads(507) Cited by(1)

Related
Proportional views

A Meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of urinary fungal infection

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.04.021
  • Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10053, China
  • Received Date: 2017-07-03
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-01-19

Abstract: Objective Systematic evaluation of effectiveness and safety of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in urinary tract fungal infection. Methods Cross-sectional or controlled studies of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of urinary tract fungal infection were collected by the search of Pubmed, Embase, WEB OF SCIENCE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, ViP Database and SinoMed. Results 12 studies with 853 patients were included. Amphotericin B bladder irrigation had fungal clearance rate RR=0.81[0.75, 0.87] after 24 hours and 0.71[0.63, 0.79] after > 5 days. Clearance of candiduria in 24 hours with amphotericin B continuous irrigation was 0.83[0.75,0.91], while the intermittent bladder irrigation was 0.78[0.68,0.88]. Clearance of candiduria >5 days for those two groups was 0.74[0.65,0.84] and 0.60[0.44,0.76]. In the comparative studies with amphotericin B bladder irrigation vs fluconazole, clearance of candiduria in 24 hours and> 5 days was 1.27[1.07,1.50] and 0.92[0.78,1.10]. There was a report of hematuria with amphotericin B bladder irrigation. Conclusion Amphotericin B bladder irrigation showed similar efficacy in candiduria clearance as the systemic treatment with fluconazole. The continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B is more effective than intermittent irrigation. Due to the limited literatures available, the large scale double blinded clinical trials are needed to verify the efficacy.

LU Guangzhao, ZHANG He, FAN Li, SUN Zhiguo, LU Ying. Effect of different injection approaches of tumor RNA nanoliposome vaccine on the growth of colon cancer[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2021, 39(6): 520-524, 556. doi: 10.12206/j.issn.1006-0111.202108094
Citation: BAI Xiangrong, CHENG Hongqin, ZHANG Yan, JIN Yin. A Meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B bladder irrigation in the treatment of urinary fungal infection[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2018, 36(4): 379-384. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0111.2018.04.021
shu

    HTML

Reference (16)

Catalog

  • HTML

版权所有：《药学实践与服务》编辑委员会

Supervisor & Sponsors: Address: No 325 Guohe Road, ShanghaiPost Code: 200433

Tel: （021）81871324,81871397 E-mail: yxsjzzs@163.com

网站备案号 沪ICP备05003363号-1

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return