Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code

ZHANG Mei-he, HUANG Cheng-hua, DING Xiao-hu, SHEN Xiao-qin, HAN Zhu-jun. A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2006, (6): 346-351.
Citation: ZHANG Mei-he, HUANG Cheng-hua, DING Xiao-hu, SHEN Xiao-qin, HAN Zhu-jun. A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2006, (6): 346-351.

A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin

  • Received Date: 2006-06-14
  • Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of indigenous gatifloxacin and levofloxacin on bacterial infection. Methods: According to the requirements of Cochrane systematic review,a thorough literature search was performed among Chinese digital Hospital Library(www.chkd.cnki.net) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Disk Database(CBM disk).A meta analysis was per- formed on a total of 2 253 patients involved in 18 papers which met the inclusion criteria. Results: The clinical effective rate of indige- nous gatifloxacin treatment group versus levofloxacin treatment group was found between the two groups( OR 1.42,95% CI 1.03~1.98,Z=2.11 P=0.03) have significant difference.Clinical cure rates、corresponding bacterial eradication rates and adverse reac- tion rates have no significant difference. Conclusions: Indigenous gatifloxacin treatment bacterial infection effectivenessis higher than levofloxacin.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(2449) PDF downloads(133) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of indigenous gatifloxacin and levofloxacin on bacterial infection. Methods: According to the requirements of Cochrane systematic review,a thorough literature search was performed among Chinese digital Hospital Library(www.chkd.cnki.net) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Disk Database(CBM disk).A meta analysis was per- formed on a total of 2 253 patients involved in 18 papers which met the inclusion criteria. Results: The clinical effective rate of indige- nous gatifloxacin treatment group versus levofloxacin treatment group was found between the two groups( OR 1.42,95% CI 1.03~1.98,Z=2.11 P=0.03) have significant difference.Clinical cure rates、corresponding bacterial eradication rates and adverse reac- tion rates have no significant difference. Conclusions: Indigenous gatifloxacin treatment bacterial infection effectivenessis higher than levofloxacin.

ZHANG Mei-he, HUANG Cheng-hua, DING Xiao-hu, SHEN Xiao-qin, HAN Zhu-jun. A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2006, (6): 346-351.
Citation: ZHANG Mei-he, HUANG Cheng-hua, DING Xiao-hu, SHEN Xiao-qin, HAN Zhu-jun. A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2006, (6): 346-351.

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return