Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
x Close Forever Close
Volume 24 Issue 6
. 
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service  > 2006  >  (6): 346-351

LI Yi-ming, CAO Yan, LIU Hong-ming, HUANG Chong-zhen, WANG Dong, ZHU Zhen-yu. Simulation of acid base titration process by computer[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2011, 29(6): 462-463,480.
Citation: ZHANG Mei-he, HUANG Cheng-hua, DING Xiao-hu, SHEN Xiao-qin, HAN Zhu-jun. A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2006, (6): 346-351.
shu

A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin

  • The Frist People's Hospital of Dongtai,Medical College of Nantong University,Dongtai 224200,China

  • Received Date: 2006-06-14
  • Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of indigenous gatifloxacin and levofloxacin on bacterial infection. Methods: According to the requirements of Cochrane systematic review,a thorough literature search was performed among Chinese digital Hospital Library(www.chkd.cnki.net) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Disk Database(CBM disk).A meta analysis was per- formed on a total of 2 253 patients involved in 18 papers which met the inclusion criteria. Results: The clinical effective rate of indige- nous gatifloxacin treatment group versus levofloxacin treatment group was found between the two groups( OR 1.42,95% CI 1.03～1.98,Z=2.11 P=0.03) have significant difference.Clinical cure rates、corresponding bacterial eradication rates and adverse reac- tion rates have no significant difference. Conclusions: Indigenous gatifloxacin treatment bacterial infection effectivenessis higher than levofloxacin.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0400.511.522.5Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 89.6 %FULLTEXT: 89.6 %META: 9.3 %META: 9.3 %PDF: 1.1 %PDF: 1.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 18.0 %其他: 18.0 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %China: 2.8 %China: 2.8 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %云浮: 0.3 %云浮: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 19.7 %北京: 19.7 %南京: 2.2 %南京: 2.2 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %大连: 0.6 %大连: 0.6 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宁波市慈溪: 0.3 %宁波市慈溪: 0.3 %广州: 1.7 %广州: 1.7 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %张家界: 0.3 %张家界: 0.3 %恩施: 0.3 %恩施: 0.3 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %杭州: 0.3 %杭州: 0.3 %梧州: 0.3 %梧州: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %焦作: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 23.6 %芒廷维尤: 23.6 %西宁: 20.8 %西宁: 20.8 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %银川: 0.6 %银川: 0.6 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %其他其他ChinaUnited States上海临沂云浮兰州北京南京南宁厦门合肥大连太原宁波市慈溪广州张家口张家界恩施成都杭州梧州济南深圳焦作石家庄福州芒廷维尤西宁重庆银川镇江长春长沙长治阳泉马鞍山Highcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Get Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(2835) PDF downloads(133) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin

  • The Frist People's Hospital of Dongtai,Medical College of Nantong University,Dongtai 224200,China
  • Received Date: 2006-06-14

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of indigenous gatifloxacin and levofloxacin on bacterial infection. Methods: According to the requirements of Cochrane systematic review,a thorough literature search was performed among Chinese digital Hospital Library(www.chkd.cnki.net) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Disk Database(CBM disk).A meta analysis was per- formed on a total of 2 253 patients involved in 18 papers which met the inclusion criteria. Results: The clinical effective rate of indige- nous gatifloxacin treatment group versus levofloxacin treatment group was found between the two groups( OR 1.42,95% CI 1.03～1.98,Z=2.11 P=0.03) have significant difference.Clinical cure rates、corresponding bacterial eradication rates and adverse reac- tion rates have no significant difference. Conclusions: Indigenous gatifloxacin treatment bacterial infection effectivenessis higher than levofloxacin.

LI Yi-ming, CAO Yan, LIU Hong-ming, HUANG Chong-zhen, WANG Dong, ZHU Zhen-yu. Simulation of acid base titration process by computer[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2011, 29(6): 462-463,480.
Citation: ZHANG Mei-he, HUANG Cheng-hua, DING Xiao-hu, SHEN Xiao-qin, HAN Zhu-jun. A meta-analysis of treatment of bacterial infections with double-blind randomized clinical study of indigenous gatifloxcin versus levofloxacin[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice and Service, 2006, (6): 346-351.
shu

    HTML

Catalog

  • HTML

版权所有：《药学实践与服务》编辑委员会

Supervisor & Sponsors: Address: No 325 Guohe Road, ShanghaiPost Code: 200433

Tel: （021）81871324,81871397 E-mail: yxsjzzs@163.com

网站备案号 沪ICP备05003363号-1

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return